Visit our sister site:
Follow us on
Front Page, Industry News
‘Titanic’ prepped for 3D reissue
Wednesday September 23rd 2009Disney’s imminent rerelease of “Toy Story” and “Toy Story 2” in 3D has many wondering if others will tap their film libraries for extra-dimensional opportunities, but it appears less a matter of if than when.
Execs on lots all around town acknowledge spitballing sessions about possible 3D rereleases. At Lightstorm Entertainment, insiders suggest it will be less than a year before a 3D rerelease is announced for a little film called “Titanic.”
“We are certainly interested in exploring the opportunity to rerelease some of Lightstorm’s past films in 3D,” Lightstorm partner Jon Landau said. “I don’t think it’s too far into the future. We’re pretty far down the road.”
In fact, Lightstorm has done 3D tests on James Cameron’s two most successful movies: “Titanic” and “Terminator 2: Judgment Day.”
Still, though several Hollywood majors also might tread that path eventually, only select projects are likely until 3D home entertainment takes hold, and that’s maybe five years down the road. Only the most well-known film classics would merit the considerable costs of converting 2D pics, not to mention the marketing expenses of 3D rereleases.
The still-skimpy installed base of 3D movie screens is another consideration, though Landau is heartened by the steady increase in those numbers and is confident a more robust 3D footprint will be in place soon.
Family films are the most obvious candidates for 3D rereleases, as tots often know classic family titles from DVD but haven’t seen them on the big screen. CGI-animated family titles top the list, as an average $8 million or so in remastering costs can be halved thanks to inherent technical advantages in the format.
But even well-known action films such as those in the “Star Wars” franchise are expected to get 3D rereleases eventually — the key word being eventually.
“I know we’re all watching this to see if there’s something there,” Universal distribution president Nikki Rocco said. “The uniqueness of 3D definitely brings something different to the table. But right now it’s wait and see.”
Disney release the 3D versions of 1995 franchise original “Toy Story” and its 1999 sequel Oct. 2 on about 1,600 screens. The reissues serve as franchise reminders in advance of the June 18 bow of “Toy Story 3,” also in 3D.
Theaters will program “Toy Story” and “Toy Story 2” back-to-back, but patrons also will have the option of hanging onto tickets to return another time within the films’ two-week run.
“It’s a huge value proposition for the audience,” Disney distribution president Chuck Viane said. “It’s a great day for the family because they can go out and enjoy two movies and have a ball.”
A likely second motivation is the prospect of eventually releasing the remastered titles in the home entertainment market, but that’s not likely for several years. Until then, some say, theatrical rereleases demand a cautious approach and could require as much as $25 million in related marketing.
“It’s economic suicide,” a top studio exec groused.
Even Disney hasn’t committed to its next 3D rerelease.
“We continue to look at past properties to see if we have the right vehicles for this format,” Viane said. “But we want to see what happens with these.”
At Fox, distribution boss Bruce Snyder said the studio has “looked at some titles that we could think about maybe doing in 3D.”
Nothing in that vein is planned imminently, but Snyder believes more than just family films could see 3D rerelease eventually.
“You’ve got older teens and early-20s males who are rabid about technology right now,” he said. “So it has the possibility of expanding from the family audience into that audience.”
The new versions of “Toy Story” and its sequel offer a new visual depth, thanks to their conversion into 3D. But don’t expect anything to fly off the screen; even Pixar’s summer hit “Up” kept the lid on overt 3D gimmickry.
The “Toy Story” conversions follow an earlier similar project at Disney, which in 2006 remastered Tim Burton’s animated creepfest “The Nightmare Before Christmas” in 3D. “Nightmare” has rung up $24 million from theatrical campaigns staged each Halloween since then.
Pixar handled 3D chores on the “Toy Story” pics. On “Nightmare,” Disney hired Industrial Light + Magic to do the work, with ILM licensing a 3D-conversion program developed by In-Three.
Westlake Village, Calif.-based In-Three has worked primarily with studios to create 3D masters for new movies being released in a mix of 2D and 3D theaters. Its execs believe other studios will follow Disney’s lead and rerelease their own classics in 3D, once the installed base of 3D screens grows.
“Everybody is worried about the number of 3D screens,” In-Three marketing vp Damian Wader said. “If you take a legacy film like ‘Star Wars’ or ‘The Matrix,’ you can’t rerelease it in 2D, only 3D.”
Until recently, there were fewer than 2,000 3D screens in place domestically.
Meanwhile, Landau has some advice for industryites bullish on 3D. Noting the costs of conversion and the inevitability of 3D dominating the theatrical landscape, he said: “If you have the ability to shoot something now in 3D, shoot it in 3D. Then you won’t have to convert it.”
‘Titanic’ prepped for 3D reissue
Film libraries to be tapped in wake of ‘Toy Story’ move
By Carl DiOrio
Sept 22, 2009, 09:00 PM ET
Disney’s imminent rerelease of “Toy Story” and “Toy Story 2” in 3D has many wondering if others will tap their film libraries for extra-dimensional opportunities, but it appears less a matter of if than when.
Execs on lots all around town acknowledge spitballing sessions about possible 3D rereleases. At Lightstorm Entertainment, insiders suggest it will be less than a year before a 3D rerelease is announced for a little film called “Titanic.”
“We are certainly interested in exploring the opportunity to rerelease some of Lightstorm’s past films in 3D,” Lightstorm partner Jon Landau said. “I don’t think it’s too far into the future. We’re pretty far down the road.”
In fact, Lightstorm has done 3D tests on James Cameron’s two most successful movies: “Titanic” and “Terminator 2: Judgment Day.”
Still, though several Hollywood majors also might tread that path eventually, only select projects are likely until 3D home entertainment takes hold, and that’s maybe five years down the road. Only the most well-known film classics would merit the considerable costs of converting 2D pics, not to mention the marketing expenses of 3D rereleases.
The still-skimpy installed base of 3D movie screens is another consideration, though Landau is heartened by the steady increase in those numbers and is confident a more robust 3D footprint will be in place soon.
Family films are the most obvious candidates for 3D rereleases, as tots often know classic family titles from DVD but haven’t seen them on the big screen. CGI-animated family titles top the list, as an average $8 million or so in remastering costs can be halved thanks to inherent technical advantages in the format.
But even well-known action films such as those in the “Star Wars” franchise are expected to get 3D rereleases eventually — the key word being eventually.
“I know we’re all watching this to see if there’s something there,” Universal distribution president Nikki Rocco said. “The uniqueness of 3D definitely brings something different to the table. But right now it’s wait and see.”
Disney release the 3D versions of 1995 franchise original “Toy Story” and its 1999 sequel Oct. 2 on about 1,600 screens. The reissues serve as franchise reminders in advance of the June 18 bow of “Toy Story 3,” also in 3D.
Theaters will program “Toy Story” and “Toy Story 2” back-to-back, but patrons also will have the option of hanging onto tickets to return another time within the films’ two-week run.
“It’s a huge value proposition for the audience,” Disney distribution president Chuck Viane said. “It’s a great day for the family because they can go out and enjoy two movies and have a ball.”
A likely second motivation is the prospect of eventually releasing the remastered titles in the home entertainment market, but that’s not likely for several years. Until then, some say, theatrical rereleases demand a cautious approach and could require as much as $25 million in related marketing.
“It’s economic suicide,” a top studio exec groused.
Even Disney hasn’t committed to its next 3D rerelease.
“We continue to look at past properties to see if we have the right vehicles for this format,” Viane said. “But we want to see what happens with these.”
At Fox, distribution boss Bruce Snyder said the studio has “looked at some titles that we could think about maybe doing in 3D.”
Nothing in that vein is planned imminently, but Snyder believes more than just family films could see 3D rerelease eventually.
“You’ve got older teens and early-20s males who are rabid about technology right now,” he said. “So it has the possibility of expanding from the family audience into that audience.”
The new versions of “Toy Story” and its sequel offer a new visual depth, thanks to their conversion into 3D. But don’t expect anything to fly off the screen; even Pixar’s summer hit “Up” kept the lid on overt 3D gimmickry.
The “Toy Story” conversions follow an earlier similar project at Disney, which in 2006 remastered Tim Burton’s animated creepfest “The Nightmare Before Christmas” in 3D. “Nightmare” has rung up $24 million from theatrical campaigns staged each Halloween since then.
Pixar handled 3D chores on the “Toy Story” pics. On “Nightmare,” Disney hired Industrial Light + Magic to do the work, with ILM licensing a 3D-conversion program developed by In-Three.
Westlake Village, Calif.-based In-Three has worked primarily with studios to create 3D masters for new movies being released in a mix of 2D and 3D theaters. Its execs believe other studios will follow Disney’s lead and rerelease their own classics in 3D, once the installed base of 3D screens grows.
“Everybody is worried about the number of 3D screens,” In-Three marketing vp Damian Wader said. “If you take a legacy film like ‘Star Wars’ or ‘The Matrix,’ you can’t rerelease it in 2D, only 3D.”
Until recently, there were fewer than 2,000 3D screens in place domestically.
Meanwhile, Landau has some advice for industryites bullish on 3D. Noting the costs of conversion and the inevitability of 3D dominating the theatrical landscape, he said: “If you have the ability to shoot something now in 3D, shoot it in 3D. Then you won’t have to convert it.”
Source: The Hollywood Reporter
Front Page, Industry News
‘Titanic’ prepped for 3D reissue
Wednesday September 23rd 2009Disney’s imminent rerelease of “Toy Story” and “Toy Story 2” in 3D has many wondering if others will tap their film libraries for extra-dimensional opportunities, but it appears less a matter of if than when.
Execs on lots all around town acknowledge spitballing sessions about possible 3D rereleases. At Lightstorm Entertainment, insiders suggest it will be less than a year before a 3D rerelease is announced for a little film called “Titanic.”
“We are certainly interested in exploring the opportunity to rerelease some of Lightstorm’s past films in 3D,” Lightstorm partner Jon Landau said. “I don’t think it’s too far into the future. We’re pretty far down the road.”
In fact, Lightstorm has done 3D tests on James Cameron’s two most successful movies: “Titanic” and “Terminator 2: Judgment Day.”
Still, though several Hollywood majors also might tread that path eventually, only select projects are likely until 3D home entertainment takes hold, and that’s maybe five years down the road. Only the most well-known film classics would merit the considerable costs of converting 2D pics, not to mention the marketing expenses of 3D rereleases.
The still-skimpy installed base of 3D movie screens is another consideration, though Landau is heartened by the steady increase in those numbers and is confident a more robust 3D footprint will be in place soon.
Family films are the most obvious candidates for 3D rereleases, as tots often know classic family titles from DVD but haven’t seen them on the big screen. CGI-animated family titles top the list, as an average $8 million or so in remastering costs can be halved thanks to inherent technical advantages in the format.
But even well-known action films such as those in the “Star Wars” franchise are expected to get 3D rereleases eventually — the key word being eventually.
“I know we’re all watching this to see if there’s something there,” Universal distribution president Nikki Rocco said. “The uniqueness of 3D definitely brings something different to the table. But right now it’s wait and see.”
Disney release the 3D versions of 1995 franchise original “Toy Story” and its 1999 sequel Oct. 2 on about 1,600 screens. The reissues serve as franchise reminders in advance of the June 18 bow of “Toy Story 3,” also in 3D.
Theaters will program “Toy Story” and “Toy Story 2” back-to-back, but patrons also will have the option of hanging onto tickets to return another time within the films’ two-week run.
“It’s a huge value proposition for the audience,” Disney distribution president Chuck Viane said. “It’s a great day for the family because they can go out and enjoy two movies and have a ball.”
A likely second motivation is the prospect of eventually releasing the remastered titles in the home entertainment market, but that’s not likely for several years. Until then, some say, theatrical rereleases demand a cautious approach and could require as much as $25 million in related marketing.
“It’s economic suicide,” a top studio exec groused.
Even Disney hasn’t committed to its next 3D rerelease.
“We continue to look at past properties to see if we have the right vehicles for this format,” Viane said. “But we want to see what happens with these.”
At Fox, distribution boss Bruce Snyder said the studio has “looked at some titles that we could think about maybe doing in 3D.”
Nothing in that vein is planned imminently, but Snyder believes more than just family films could see 3D rerelease eventually.
“You’ve got older teens and early-20s males who are rabid about technology right now,” he said. “So it has the possibility of expanding from the family audience into that audience.”
The new versions of “Toy Story” and its sequel offer a new visual depth, thanks to their conversion into 3D. But don’t expect anything to fly off the screen; even Pixar’s summer hit “Up” kept the lid on overt 3D gimmickry.
The “Toy Story” conversions follow an earlier similar project at Disney, which in 2006 remastered Tim Burton’s animated creepfest “The Nightmare Before Christmas” in 3D. “Nightmare” has rung up $24 million from theatrical campaigns staged each Halloween since then.
Pixar handled 3D chores on the “Toy Story” pics. On “Nightmare,” Disney hired Industrial Light + Magic to do the work, with ILM licensing a 3D-conversion program developed by In-Three.
Westlake Village, Calif.-based In-Three has worked primarily with studios to create 3D masters for new movies being released in a mix of 2D and 3D theaters. Its execs believe other studios will follow Disney’s lead and rerelease their own classics in 3D, once the installed base of 3D screens grows.
“Everybody is worried about the number of 3D screens,” In-Three marketing vp Damian Wader said. “If you take a legacy film like ‘Star Wars’ or ‘The Matrix,’ you can’t rerelease it in 2D, only 3D.”
Until recently, there were fewer than 2,000 3D screens in place domestically.
Meanwhile, Landau has some advice for industryites bullish on 3D. Noting the costs of conversion and the inevitability of 3D dominating the theatrical landscape, he said: “If you have the ability to shoot something now in 3D, shoot it in 3D. Then you won’t have to convert it.”
‘Titanic’ prepped for 3D reissue
Film libraries to be tapped in wake of ‘Toy Story’ move
By Carl DiOrio
Sept 22, 2009, 09:00 PM ET
Disney’s imminent rerelease of “Toy Story” and “Toy Story 2” in 3D has many wondering if others will tap their film libraries for extra-dimensional opportunities, but it appears less a matter of if than when.
Execs on lots all around town acknowledge spitballing sessions about possible 3D rereleases. At Lightstorm Entertainment, insiders suggest it will be less than a year before a 3D rerelease is announced for a little film called “Titanic.”
“We are certainly interested in exploring the opportunity to rerelease some of Lightstorm’s past films in 3D,” Lightstorm partner Jon Landau said. “I don’t think it’s too far into the future. We’re pretty far down the road.”
In fact, Lightstorm has done 3D tests on James Cameron’s two most successful movies: “Titanic” and “Terminator 2: Judgment Day.”
Still, though several Hollywood majors also might tread that path eventually, only select projects are likely until 3D home entertainment takes hold, and that’s maybe five years down the road. Only the most well-known film classics would merit the considerable costs of converting 2D pics, not to mention the marketing expenses of 3D rereleases.
The still-skimpy installed base of 3D movie screens is another consideration, though Landau is heartened by the steady increase in those numbers and is confident a more robust 3D footprint will be in place soon.
Family films are the most obvious candidates for 3D rereleases, as tots often know classic family titles from DVD but haven’t seen them on the big screen. CGI-animated family titles top the list, as an average $8 million or so in remastering costs can be halved thanks to inherent technical advantages in the format.
But even well-known action films such as those in the “Star Wars” franchise are expected to get 3D rereleases eventually — the key word being eventually.
“I know we’re all watching this to see if there’s something there,” Universal distribution president Nikki Rocco said. “The uniqueness of 3D definitely brings something different to the table. But right now it’s wait and see.”
Disney release the 3D versions of 1995 franchise original “Toy Story” and its 1999 sequel Oct. 2 on about 1,600 screens. The reissues serve as franchise reminders in advance of the June 18 bow of “Toy Story 3,” also in 3D.
Theaters will program “Toy Story” and “Toy Story 2” back-to-back, but patrons also will have the option of hanging onto tickets to return another time within the films’ two-week run.
“It’s a huge value proposition for the audience,” Disney distribution president Chuck Viane said. “It’s a great day for the family because they can go out and enjoy two movies and have a ball.”
A likely second motivation is the prospect of eventually releasing the remastered titles in the home entertainment market, but that’s not likely for several years. Until then, some say, theatrical rereleases demand a cautious approach and could require as much as $25 million in related marketing.
“It’s economic suicide,” a top studio exec groused.
Even Disney hasn’t committed to its next 3D rerelease.
“We continue to look at past properties to see if we have the right vehicles for this format,” Viane said. “But we want to see what happens with these.”
At Fox, distribution boss Bruce Snyder said the studio has “looked at some titles that we could think about maybe doing in 3D.”
Nothing in that vein is planned imminently, but Snyder believes more than just family films could see 3D rerelease eventually.
“You’ve got older teens and early-20s males who are rabid about technology right now,” he said. “So it has the possibility of expanding from the family audience into that audience.”
The new versions of “Toy Story” and its sequel offer a new visual depth, thanks to their conversion into 3D. But don’t expect anything to fly off the screen; even Pixar’s summer hit “Up” kept the lid on overt 3D gimmickry.
The “Toy Story” conversions follow an earlier similar project at Disney, which in 2006 remastered Tim Burton’s animated creepfest “The Nightmare Before Christmas” in 3D. “Nightmare” has rung up $24 million from theatrical campaigns staged each Halloween since then.
Pixar handled 3D chores on the “Toy Story” pics. On “Nightmare,” Disney hired Industrial Light + Magic to do the work, with ILM licensing a 3D-conversion program developed by In-Three.
Westlake Village, Calif.-based In-Three has worked primarily with studios to create 3D masters for new movies being released in a mix of 2D and 3D theaters. Its execs believe other studios will follow Disney’s lead and rerelease their own classics in 3D, once the installed base of 3D screens grows.
“Everybody is worried about the number of 3D screens,” In-Three marketing vp Damian Wader said. “If you take a legacy film like ‘Star Wars’ or ‘The Matrix,’ you can’t rerelease it in 2D, only 3D.”
Until recently, there were fewer than 2,000 3D screens in place domestically.
Meanwhile, Landau has some advice for industryites bullish on 3D. Noting the costs of conversion and the inevitability of 3D dominating the theatrical landscape, he said: “If you have the ability to shoot something now in 3D, shoot it in 3D. Then you won’t have to convert it.”
Source: The Hollywood Reporter
Leave a Reply
Front Page, Industry News
‘Titanic’ prepped for 3D reissue
Wednesday September 23rd 2009Disney’s imminent rerelease of “Toy Story” and “Toy Story 2” in 3D has many wondering if others will tap their film libraries for extra-dimensional opportunities, but it appears less a matter of if than when.
Execs on lots all around town acknowledge spitballing sessions about possible 3D rereleases. At Lightstorm Entertainment, insiders suggest it will be less than a year before a 3D rerelease is announced for a little film called “Titanic.”
“We are certainly interested in exploring the opportunity to rerelease some of Lightstorm’s past films in 3D,” Lightstorm partner Jon Landau said. “I don’t think it’s too far into the future. We’re pretty far down the road.”
In fact, Lightstorm has done 3D tests on James Cameron’s two most successful movies: “Titanic” and “Terminator 2: Judgment Day.”
Still, though several Hollywood majors also might tread that path eventually, only select projects are likely until 3D home entertainment takes hold, and that’s maybe five years down the road. Only the most well-known film classics would merit the considerable costs of converting 2D pics, not to mention the marketing expenses of 3D rereleases.
The still-skimpy installed base of 3D movie screens is another consideration, though Landau is heartened by the steady increase in those numbers and is confident a more robust 3D footprint will be in place soon.
Family films are the most obvious candidates for 3D rereleases, as tots often know classic family titles from DVD but haven’t seen them on the big screen. CGI-animated family titles top the list, as an average $8 million or so in remastering costs can be halved thanks to inherent technical advantages in the format.
But even well-known action films such as those in the “Star Wars” franchise are expected to get 3D rereleases eventually — the key word being eventually.
“I know we’re all watching this to see if there’s something there,” Universal distribution president Nikki Rocco said. “The uniqueness of 3D definitely brings something different to the table. But right now it’s wait and see.”
Disney release the 3D versions of 1995 franchise original “Toy Story” and its 1999 sequel Oct. 2 on about 1,600 screens. The reissues serve as franchise reminders in advance of the June 18 bow of “Toy Story 3,” also in 3D.
Theaters will program “Toy Story” and “Toy Story 2” back-to-back, but patrons also will have the option of hanging onto tickets to return another time within the films’ two-week run.
“It’s a huge value proposition for the audience,” Disney distribution president Chuck Viane said. “It’s a great day for the family because they can go out and enjoy two movies and have a ball.”
A likely second motivation is the prospect of eventually releasing the remastered titles in the home entertainment market, but that’s not likely for several years. Until then, some say, theatrical rereleases demand a cautious approach and could require as much as $25 million in related marketing.
“It’s economic suicide,” a top studio exec groused.
Even Disney hasn’t committed to its next 3D rerelease.
“We continue to look at past properties to see if we have the right vehicles for this format,” Viane said. “But we want to see what happens with these.”
At Fox, distribution boss Bruce Snyder said the studio has “looked at some titles that we could think about maybe doing in 3D.”
Nothing in that vein is planned imminently, but Snyder believes more than just family films could see 3D rerelease eventually.
“You’ve got older teens and early-20s males who are rabid about technology right now,” he said. “So it has the possibility of expanding from the family audience into that audience.”
The new versions of “Toy Story” and its sequel offer a new visual depth, thanks to their conversion into 3D. But don’t expect anything to fly off the screen; even Pixar’s summer hit “Up” kept the lid on overt 3D gimmickry.
The “Toy Story” conversions follow an earlier similar project at Disney, which in 2006 remastered Tim Burton’s animated creepfest “The Nightmare Before Christmas” in 3D. “Nightmare” has rung up $24 million from theatrical campaigns staged each Halloween since then.
Pixar handled 3D chores on the “Toy Story” pics. On “Nightmare,” Disney hired Industrial Light + Magic to do the work, with ILM licensing a 3D-conversion program developed by In-Three.
Westlake Village, Calif.-based In-Three has worked primarily with studios to create 3D masters for new movies being released in a mix of 2D and 3D theaters. Its execs believe other studios will follow Disney’s lead and rerelease their own classics in 3D, once the installed base of 3D screens grows.
“Everybody is worried about the number of 3D screens,” In-Three marketing vp Damian Wader said. “If you take a legacy film like ‘Star Wars’ or ‘The Matrix,’ you can’t rerelease it in 2D, only 3D.”
Until recently, there were fewer than 2,000 3D screens in place domestically.
Meanwhile, Landau has some advice for industryites bullish on 3D. Noting the costs of conversion and the inevitability of 3D dominating the theatrical landscape, he said: “If you have the ability to shoot something now in 3D, shoot it in 3D. Then you won’t have to convert it.”
‘Titanic’ prepped for 3D reissue
Film libraries to be tapped in wake of ‘Toy Story’ move
By Carl DiOrio
Sept 22, 2009, 09:00 PM ET
Disney’s imminent rerelease of “Toy Story” and “Toy Story 2” in 3D has many wondering if others will tap their film libraries for extra-dimensional opportunities, but it appears less a matter of if than when.
Execs on lots all around town acknowledge spitballing sessions about possible 3D rereleases. At Lightstorm Entertainment, insiders suggest it will be less than a year before a 3D rerelease is announced for a little film called “Titanic.”
“We are certainly interested in exploring the opportunity to rerelease some of Lightstorm’s past films in 3D,” Lightstorm partner Jon Landau said. “I don’t think it’s too far into the future. We’re pretty far down the road.”
In fact, Lightstorm has done 3D tests on James Cameron’s two most successful movies: “Titanic” and “Terminator 2: Judgment Day.”
Still, though several Hollywood majors also might tread that path eventually, only select projects are likely until 3D home entertainment takes hold, and that’s maybe five years down the road. Only the most well-known film classics would merit the considerable costs of converting 2D pics, not to mention the marketing expenses of 3D rereleases.
The still-skimpy installed base of 3D movie screens is another consideration, though Landau is heartened by the steady increase in those numbers and is confident a more robust 3D footprint will be in place soon.
Family films are the most obvious candidates for 3D rereleases, as tots often know classic family titles from DVD but haven’t seen them on the big screen. CGI-animated family titles top the list, as an average $8 million or so in remastering costs can be halved thanks to inherent technical advantages in the format.
But even well-known action films such as those in the “Star Wars” franchise are expected to get 3D rereleases eventually — the key word being eventually.
“I know we’re all watching this to see if there’s something there,” Universal distribution president Nikki Rocco said. “The uniqueness of 3D definitely brings something different to the table. But right now it’s wait and see.”
Disney release the 3D versions of 1995 franchise original “Toy Story” and its 1999 sequel Oct. 2 on about 1,600 screens. The reissues serve as franchise reminders in advance of the June 18 bow of “Toy Story 3,” also in 3D.
Theaters will program “Toy Story” and “Toy Story 2” back-to-back, but patrons also will have the option of hanging onto tickets to return another time within the films’ two-week run.
“It’s a huge value proposition for the audience,” Disney distribution president Chuck Viane said. “It’s a great day for the family because they can go out and enjoy two movies and have a ball.”
A likely second motivation is the prospect of eventually releasing the remastered titles in the home entertainment market, but that’s not likely for several years. Until then, some say, theatrical rereleases demand a cautious approach and could require as much as $25 million in related marketing.
“It’s economic suicide,” a top studio exec groused.
Even Disney hasn’t committed to its next 3D rerelease.
“We continue to look at past properties to see if we have the right vehicles for this format,” Viane said. “But we want to see what happens with these.”
At Fox, distribution boss Bruce Snyder said the studio has “looked at some titles that we could think about maybe doing in 3D.”
Nothing in that vein is planned imminently, but Snyder believes more than just family films could see 3D rerelease eventually.
“You’ve got older teens and early-20s males who are rabid about technology right now,” he said. “So it has the possibility of expanding from the family audience into that audience.”
The new versions of “Toy Story” and its sequel offer a new visual depth, thanks to their conversion into 3D. But don’t expect anything to fly off the screen; even Pixar’s summer hit “Up” kept the lid on overt 3D gimmickry.
The “Toy Story” conversions follow an earlier similar project at Disney, which in 2006 remastered Tim Burton’s animated creepfest “The Nightmare Before Christmas” in 3D. “Nightmare” has rung up $24 million from theatrical campaigns staged each Halloween since then.
Pixar handled 3D chores on the “Toy Story” pics. On “Nightmare,” Disney hired Industrial Light + Magic to do the work, with ILM licensing a 3D-conversion program developed by In-Three.
Westlake Village, Calif.-based In-Three has worked primarily with studios to create 3D masters for new movies being released in a mix of 2D and 3D theaters. Its execs believe other studios will follow Disney’s lead and rerelease their own classics in 3D, once the installed base of 3D screens grows.
“Everybody is worried about the number of 3D screens,” In-Three marketing vp Damian Wader said. “If you take a legacy film like ‘Star Wars’ or ‘The Matrix,’ you can’t rerelease it in 2D, only 3D.”
Until recently, there were fewer than 2,000 3D screens in place domestically.
Meanwhile, Landau has some advice for industryites bullish on 3D. Noting the costs of conversion and the inevitability of 3D dominating the theatrical landscape, he said: “If you have the ability to shoot something now in 3D, shoot it in 3D. Then you won’t have to convert it.”
Source: The Hollywood Reporter
Leave a Reply
Advertisements
