Tag Archives: actra

$5.65 a year for the internet, and the agreement the CFTPA walked away from

TORONTO – So why did the mediation between ACTRA and the CFTPA breakdown on February 8? The answer is to be found in a number, and in an important missed opportunity.

INTERNET FOR FREE, IN RETURN FOR $5.65 A YEAR

First, the number. What the CFTPA proposed yesterday was that ACTRA agree to assign internet rights without any revenue-sharing, for five years, in return for a 1% annual fee.

ACTRA’s daily minimum fee is $565. So, this offer amounts to $5.65 a year on a daily rate, for each of five years.

In return for this $5.65 annual fee, ACTRA was asked to agree to free worldwide distribution in “any new media now known” – including internet websites like Walmart, wireless, IP television, handhelds, iPods, cell phones, etc.

No revenues would be shared with performers during those five years.

Furthermore, as proposed, these terms would apply to every production ever produced in the past 64 years.

To further motivate ACTRA to agree to these terms, the CFTPA proposed that performers accept a 0% pay increase in the first year of the agreement, in order to pay for these fees. In other words, performers would fund the $5.65 fee out of the pay increase they would otherwise receive. And then accept zero revenue sharing on internet distribution for five years.

Disguised in a convoluted proposal, that is “internet for free.”

CFTPA RENEGES ON TENTATIVE AGREEMENT

Then there’s the missed opportunity.

People concerned about what these negotiations are doing to our industry have the right to know that in a series of talks leading up to this week’s mediation, ACTRA reached a very different tentative agreement with CFTPA negotiators on the internet.

The form of this agreement was finalized on a phone call between an ACTRA team led by Stephen Waddell and a CFTPA team led by John Barrack on February 5, 2007.

In these discussions, ACTRA accepted a model outlined in principle by the CFTPA earlier in negotiations, but never converted into a proposal until this week.

…/2

2

The idea proposed was, “we make a dollar on the internet, you make a dollar.”

ACTRA negotiators agreed to assign internet rights to producers. In return, producers would agree to share 3.6% of any revenues made specifically from the internet, from the first day a production was distributed there.

The only detail left to discuss with the mediator was whether or not there should be a small advance payment paid. An “advance payment” is exactly what it says – a sum paid in advance, deducted against future revenues.

ACTRA’s negotiating team went into this mediation optimistic that this dispute would now be settled. And we were therefore shocked when we received the producers’ first proposal – which proposed the outrageous $5.65 annual fee, funded by performers themselves from their pay, in return for assignment of free internet rights for five years.

We assumed this was the normal CFTPA lowball first proposal.

In ACTRA’s counter-proposal we submitted the terms that had been tentatively agreed only 48 hours before.

Our proposal was then angrily rejected by the CFTPA. They re-submitted their internet-for-free proposal, demanded it be accepted as drafted, and then walked out of the mediation at 4:00 p.m. on the second day (February 8, 2007).

WHY DID THE CFTPA WALK OUT?

The CFTPA owes the film and television industry an explanation.

Our theory is that it has something to do with the fact that there were only two working Canadian producers in their room – and eight Hollywood lawyers.

Eight Hollywood lawyers who appear to be using the CFTPA as a proxy and a puppet in their looming battle on this issue with the Writers Guild of America, the Directors Guild of America, and the Screen Actors Guild.

Judging from the proposal imposed on the CFTPA in a marathon eight-hour closed-door meeting on the first day, while we cooled our heels in our own room, they want the internet for free.

Getting off that idea, as CFTPA negotiators had agreed to do only a day earlier, is what it’s going to take to settle this dispute. We’ll have more to say about the outrageous performance we witnessed in this mediation in coming days.

No settlement in ACTRA strike

TORONTO (CP) _ Two days of federal mediation aimed at settling the national performers strike ended Thursday without a deal, ACTRA said in a news release.

Federal mediator Elizabeth MacPherson has invited the union and producers to additional talks by phone next week, the union said.

"The two parties narrowed the issues slightly but failed to reach agreement," said the union which represents 21,000 members across Canada.

The performers went on strike Jan. 8 after ACTRA members voted 97.6 per cent in favour of walking off the job.

A key sticking point in the dispute is compensation for performances viewed in new and emerging media platforms.

"Corner Gas" star Eric Peterson, comedian Colin Mochrie and actress Wendy Crewson are among Canadian performers who have complained they’re being asked to work for free on Internet and cellphone broadcasts.

Open Letter to CFTPA

TORONTO ACTRA issued the following open letter to John Barrack, Lead Counsel for the Canadian Film and Television Production Association (CFTPA) today.

Dear John,

As you are aware, yesterday both you and I were contacted by a concerned industry group, including some of Toronto’s major producers. We were both invited (and urged) to resume settlement discussions immediately. The group volunteered the offices of a member of the CFTPA who has called on both of us to get this dispute settled. They proposed talks begin at 2:00 p.m. tomorrow.

ACTRA has agreed to attend these talks at 2:00 p.m. tomorrow. I am hopeful you’ll confirm both to us and to the production community as a whole that you will also attend, with reasonable proposals and an intention to settle.

We are of course also prepared to meet next week.

As you are aware, the court did not come to any view about the legality of our strike action or tactics. It threw out your application for an injunction on grounds you were not able to provide any cause for such an injunction. And the court directed both of us to litigate any remaining process issues through an arbitrator. As you are aware we demur on this second point as a point of law. In any event, the process the court has asked us to follow is about process issues, not about the substance of this contract dispute – which can only be resolved through negotiations.

We will be there at 2:00 pm tomorrow. I hope to see you there.

Thank you.

Stephen A. Waddell

National Executive Director

ACTRA strike causing devastating effect throughout Toronto’s production industry

By: Mike Zembowski

On Jan 8 members Canada’s actors union went on strike for the first time in 64 years and the direct impact to the Toronto production industry has been “Disastrous and Crippling,” says Don Carmody who has all future projects on hold. 

“ACTRA is not thinking about the industry as a whole, long term. They are being very selfish. This strike is driving US business elsewhere and can cripple the industry.”

While ACTRA holds up production several businesses are wondering how long they can hold out before having to lay off people or worse have close up for good. Peter Lukas owner of Showline Studios in Toronto admits,

“The direct impact to Showline Studios is a $150,000 loss. We had a US production called “Shoot Em Up,” reserve all production offices and our 14K studio. The US producer suggested waiting until Jan. 8th thinking there is no way the strike will last. With no end in site, they cancelled the whole shoot and changed to Hollywood. This cost Showline $150,000.00 and no telling how much more this will cost in the future. 

Rival studio owner Steve Mirkopoulos of Cinespace Film Studios says,

“The business is dead. Whatever productions that were shooting with continuation agreements are now wrapping. There are zero productions in the horizon. At the end of October there were 8 or 9 productions putting holds on our space and after speaking to producers recently they are not coming up here until after the strike.”

The strike comes at a time when the industry has steadily been declining over the last 5 years. Paul Bronfman Chairman/CEO of Comweb group explains,

“The cost to the industry is already over a hundred million and the direct impact to our company is easily a few hundred thousand of lost business.” 

Brian Dwight owner of Dwight Crane says, “This year was worse than SARS, the business right now is non existent. Estimated cost is easily $500,000.00 per month.  ACTRA’s methods are borderline extortion. If they all don’t smarten up there won’t be an industry.

The CFTPA is banking on winning an injunction in court and breaking the union’s strike through legal orders.  CFTPA is adamant that it will force the union to accept ‘internet-for-free’ proposals. The CFTPA has not budged from that position and won’t put a different offer on the table even with the assistance of a facilitator. 

Toronto once known for having the best crews in the world, are slowly loosing them to cities like Winnepeg and Vancouver that are seeing more productions.

There are currently no Feature Films shooting in Toronto and 5 television shows according to the latest production list from Toronto Film and TV office. 

Will this problem come to an end relies only on how well negotiations go this week for both sides. We can only hope both sides see the seriousness of finding an answer quickly.

CFTPA want court appointed arbitrator

TORONTO (CP) _ A strike by 21,000 Canadian film, television and radio workers is against the law, say producers who went to court Tuesday in hopes of convincing a judge to appoint an arbitrator to resolve the two-week-old dispute.

The Canadian Film and Television Production Association took its battle to Ontario’s Superior Court after talks with ACTRA, the union that represents striking workers, broke down.

The strike violates the terms of the Independent Production Agreement _ the contract between producers and the union _ and gives ACTRA an unfair advantage in negotiations, argued John Rook, a lawyer for the CFTPA.

The producers want the court to suspend special agreements between the union and individual producers, which allow members to keep working despite the strike.

They also want a court order restraining ACTRA from engaging in what the CFTPA calls an "unlawful strike" until a court-appointed arbitrator can decide its legality.

"ACTRA has refused or failed to comply with the terms of the agreement. We think the court has the authority to make them comply," Rook said. "ACTRA effectively gained the upper hand by declaring a strike, but by virtue of the continuation agreements, everyone gets to stay at work."

Performers went on strike Jan. 8 after ACTRA members voted 97.6 per cent in favour of walking off the job. The major sticking point for members involves compensation for performances broadcast over the Internet and on cellular phones.

ACTRA national president Richard Hardacre said the special agreements between producers and performers were made to ensure production could continue into the new year, even though the contract expired on Dec. 31.

"We’re trying to be creative. We’re not trying to be manipulative," Hardacre told reporters outside the courtroom, noting the side deals are essentially a continuation of the current contract plus a five per cent wage hike.

"The producers themselves . . . have actually broken ranks with their association because they want to work and they want there to be stability in this industry."

Hardacre contends the strike is legal and that the union would be happy to argue that fact before the labour board, where he feels the matter belongs.

CFTPA, however, took its fight to court on the grounds that performers are not employees and therefore not governed under the Labour Relations Act.

Hardacre said he believes producers are now contesting ACTRA’s status as a labour union, despite its 64-year history as such, in order to stall the current round of collective bargaining.

"We’re willing to defend ourselves with the labour law. They want to hold us strictly to means within the (Independent Production Agreement)," he said. "It seems to be in their interest to not have a settlement right now."

The union said it asked producers to put a global offer to settle on the table and that talks broke down after it refused.

Producers said talks broke down when ACTRA made an unreasonable demand for a 50 per cent increase in fees for new media production, but ACTRA maintains it proposed all digital media issues to be referred to a joint committee so the industry could get back to work.

Posts navigation